EMC x Grha Kedoya: Creating One Digital Front Door for a Unified Healthcare Group

Client

EMC Healthcare

Year

2024 - 2024

EMC x Grha Kedoya: Creating One Digital Front Door for a Unified Healthcare Group
EMC Healthcare

Bringing two hospital experiences into one patient journey

EMC Hospital and Grha Kedoya Hospital are private healthcare providers within the EMTEK Group. Both had previously worked with Suitmedia to develop their own websites and mobile applications, each designed around the needs of its hospital and patients.

Following the hospitals’ merger, their digital platforms needed to evolve as well. Patients could still encounter separate websites and applications with different features, layouts, login processes, telehealth functions, doctor directories, and appointment paths.

Suitmedia helped consolidate the digital experience by transferring key Grha Kedoya functions into EMC Hospital’s established platforms. The goal was not simply to close one website or redirect users to another. It was to create a more consistent digital environment in which patients could find information, book appointments, access telehealth, and navigate hospital services with less confusion.


Two successful platforms had become one experience too many

1. A corporate merger had created a digital continuity problem

Before the merger, it was reasonable for EMC Hospital and Grha Kedoya Hospital to maintain separate digital platforms. Each hospital had its own patients, services, operational needs, and brand context.

After the merger, however, maintaining two separate digital experiences created a new problem. Patients could encounter different ways of performing similar tasks depending on which hospital website or app they opened.

This created a gap between the organization’s unified direction and the experience patients received online. The hospitals were becoming more connected operationally, but their digital channels still reflected separate systems.

2. Inconsistent features could weaken patient confidence

The two platforms did not offer exactly the same functionality. Login, telehealth appointments, hospital directories, doctor listings, and other services could behave differently across websites and apps.

For patients, inconsistency creates unnecessary learning. A person who already understands how to book an appointment on one platform may hesitate when the process looks different on another.

In healthcare, this matters more than it might in ordinary consumer services. Patients are often navigating the platform while dealing with concern, urgency, or limited time. Confusion can quickly become frustration or distrust.

3. Patients needed a clear answer to a basic question

After the merger, users needed to understand where to go for information and services. They should not have to know the internal history of the two hospitals to access care.

If one platform remained active while another became the primary destination, patients needed a clear and reliable transition. They had to know which website or app to use, whether their existing account remained relevant, and where key services had moved.

The digital experience needed to make this change understandable rather than asking patients to solve the transition themselves.

4. Redirection alone would not solve the underlying issue

A simple redirect could send users from Grha Kedoya’s website to EMC’s platform, but it would not automatically ensure that the destination contained the information patients expected.

Users may be redirected successfully but still struggle to find the right hospital, doctor, specialty center, or appointment function. The destination needed to be prepared for the needs of both hospital audiences.

The work therefore required more than technical routing. It required careful integration of content, features, and navigation.

5. Two brands needed to become one coherent digital system

The merged organization needed a consistent identity across websites and mobile applications. This did not mean erasing the history or relevance of Grha Kedoya.

Patients still needed to find information about Grha Kedoya, its doctors, services, and facilities. But that information had to exist within a platform that clearly reflected the unified EMC healthcare system.

The challenge was to preserve necessary hospital-level information while establishing one shared digital logic.

6. Operational management was becoming unnecessarily complex

Maintaining separate platforms can increase the effort required to update information, manage features, coordinate releases, and support users.

If the same type of information must be maintained in two places, inconsistencies can emerge. A doctor may appear on one platform but not another. A promotion may be updated in one location but not the other. A telehealth function may have different rules across systems.

A unified platform could reduce this duplication and make digital services easier to manage over time.

7. The merger created an opportunity to improve more than consistency

The project was not only about bringing two platforms into alignment. It was also an opportunity to improve the patient journey.

By comparing the existing websites and apps, Suitmedia could identify which features worked well, which caused friction, and which elements should be retained or replaced.

This meant the merger could become a point of digital improvement. The organization could emerge with a stronger platform than either separate system offered on its own.

8. The group needed to protect existing investment

Both EMC and Grha Kedoya had already invested in websites and mobile applications. A merger could not simply discard that work without understanding its value.

Suitmedia needed to identify which functions from Grha Kedoya should be transferred, how they would fit into EMC’s system, and which elements needed redesign to match the established platform.

This approach protected useful capabilities while avoiding the cost and disruption of rebuilding everything from the beginning.


Designing one platform around consistency and patient intent

1. Study both existing user journeys before deciding what to merge

Suitmedia began with an in-depth analysis of the existing features and user journeys on both hospital platforms.

The objective was to understand how patients currently moved through each experience. This included examining how users logged in, accessed telehealth appointments, found doctors and hospitals, explored specialties, and reached appointment actions.

Comparing the two journeys made the differences visible. It also helped determine which patterns were clearer and which created unnecessary effort.

2. Separate essential functions from inherited differences

Not every difference between the two platforms represented meaningful value. Some differences reflected genuine hospital needs, while others existed simply because the systems had evolved separately.

Suitmedia assessed which features and design elements should be retained, modified, or replaced. This prevented the unified platform from becoming a compromise filled with every legacy behavior.

The guiding principle was usefulness. A feature belonged in the new experience if it helped patients or supported the hospitals’ operating needs—not simply because it existed before.

3. Align Grha Kedoya with EMC’s established platform

The strategy focused on bringing key Grha Kedoya functions into EMC Hospital’s existing website and mobile application environment.

This created one primary digital destination while preserving access to important Grha Kedoya information.

Using EMC’s platform as the foundation also helped establish a common experience. Patients interacting with different hospital services could encounter familiar navigation, interface patterns, and functional expectations.

4. Update login and telehealth functions

Login and telehealth appointment functions from Grha Kedoya were adjusted to align with EMC’s standards.

This was important because authentication and telehealth are high-trust parts of the patient journey. Inconsistent login rules or appointment behavior can create immediate confusion.

Aligning these functions reduced the need for patients to learn separate systems. It also helped EMC manage access and telehealth services through a more consistent operating model.

5. Use pop-ups to guide users through the transition

Pop-ups were added to the Grha Kedoya website and mobile application to redirect users toward the EMC platform.

The purpose was to make the migration visible and understandable. Users should not arrive at an old platform and be left to determine what has changed.

A well-designed transition message can reduce uncertainty by explaining where the user should go next. It can also preserve trust by acknowledging the change rather than silently moving people between systems.

6. Maintain access to Grha Kedoya’s identity and information

The integrated platform updated menus for “Our Hospitals,” “Specialty Centers,” and “Our Doctors.”

These sections helped ensure that Grha Kedoya remained discoverable within the unified system. Patients could still find hospital-specific information while experiencing the broader EMC digital environment.

This was essential to avoiding a false choice between integration and local relevance. A unified platform could contain distinct hospital information without forcing users to navigate separate digital identities.

7. Improve doctor discovery across the merged system

Doctor listings were adapted to fit the EMC platform and support the needs of both hospitals.

Doctor information is central to patient decision-making. Users need to know which professionals are available, what they specialize in, and where they practice.

A shared doctor directory made this information easier to find and created a more consistent path toward appointment booking. It also reduced the risk of users overlooking a doctor because the information existed only on a separate legacy platform.

8. Organize specialty centers more clearly

The “Specialty Centers” menu helped users understand areas of clinical expertise within the combined healthcare system.

Patients do not always begin with a doctor’s name. They may begin with a health concern or a specialty they believe is relevant.

Making specialty centers visible created another route into care. Users could explore an area of expertise, identify relevant doctors, and move toward an appointment without needing to know the internal structure of the hospital group.

9. Add new article submenus

Additional submenus were introduced in the Articles section.

This helped organize health content and information more effectively within the unified platform. Articles can serve different roles: patient education, service awareness, hospital updates, or condition-related guidance.

A clearer article structure made it easier for users to find relevant information and gave EMC a stronger basis for continuing health communication across the merged platform.

10. Add a “Make a Visit Appointment” call to action

A “Make a Visit Appointment” call to action was added within the Promo menu.

This connected promotional content with a practical next step. A user who discovered a service, health program, or hospital offer could move more directly toward scheduling a visit.

The decision also recognized a common gap in healthcare websites: information may attract attention, but the action needed to be visible at the moment of interest.

11. Preserve the relationship between content and action

The integrated experience was designed to help users move from learning to doing.

A patient could explore a hospital or specialty center, review doctor information, read an article or promotion, and then find a clear route to appointment booking.

This reduced the risk that content would remain isolated from the service journey. Information became more valuable because it connected to a practical patient action.

12. Use agile delivery to manage a complex transition

Suitmedia used agile methodologies and modern web and mobile development tools during implementation.

An incremental approach was appropriate because the project involved multiple platforms, features, stakeholders, and transition requirements. The team could review progress, address issues, and refine integrations in stages.

This helped reduce delivery risk. Instead of waiting until the end to discover that a feature did not fit the new system, the team could identify and solve problems as the work progressed.

13. Test the experience across both website and mobile app

The merger affected more than one digital touchpoint. Patients could encounter EMC and Grha Kedoya through websites or mobile applications.

The integrated experience therefore needed to be consistent across channels. A feature that was clear on the website but confusing in the app would recreate the original problem in a different form.

Cross-platform review helped maintain a shared understanding of the patient journey. Users could move between devices without facing completely different rules or structures.

14. Build one system that can support future changes

The unified platform needed to remain useful as EMC’s healthcare group evolved.

New doctors, services, hospitals, articles, promotions, and digital features would need to be added over time. A clear shared structure made these future updates easier to manage.

The merger therefore created more than a new digital destination. It established a foundation for continued digital service development across the group.

15. Make the transition understandable for existing users

Existing Grha Kedoya users may have developed habits around the old website or app. Any migration could create concern about where their information and services had gone.

Clear redirection, familiar functions, and consistent access paths helped reduce that disruption.

The aim was to make users feel guided rather than displaced. A digital merger succeeds when patients can continue their journey without having to understand the technical changes behind it.


One integrated platform made healthcare access more coherent

1. EMC and Grha Kedoya gained a unified digital presence

Suitmedia helped consolidate the two hospitals’ digital platforms by integrating key Grha Kedoya functions into EMC’s website and mobile application.

This created a clearer digital front door for the combined healthcare organization. Patients had a more consistent place to find information, services, and appointment options.

The unified presence also strengthened the overall brand identity. Users could understand the relationship between the hospitals without encountering disconnected digital systems.

2. Patients experienced more consistent functionality

Login, telehealth appointments, hospital directories, doctor listings, and other features were aligned with EMC’s established platform.

This reduced the differences patients had previously encountered between the two hospitals’ digital channels. Users could rely on more familiar behavior regardless of which hospital information they were seeking.

Consistency reduced learning effort and supported greater confidence in the platform.

3. Existing Grha Kedoya users received a clearer transition

Pop-ups on the Grha Kedoya website and app directed users toward EMC’s platform.

This created a visible migration path and reduced the chance that users would remain on outdated or incomplete digital channels.

The transition approach also helped preserve the relationship with existing patients. They were given guidance on where to continue rather than being left to discover the change independently.

4. Hospital and doctor information became easier to navigate

Updated menus for hospitals, specialty centers, and doctors created more direct routes into the combined system.

Patients could approach care through the route that matched their needs: by hospital, specialty, or doctor.

This flexibility improved usability because not every patient begins the search from the same point. Some know the location they want, while others begin with a health concern or preferred specialist.

5. Appointment actions became more visible

The “Make a Visit Appointment” call to action connected promotions with scheduling.

This helped reduce the distance between discovering information and taking action. Patients could move forward without searching for the appointment function separately.

The change also improved the commercial and service value of content. Promotions and articles could now support patient access rather than ending with passive awareness.

6. Article content became more organized

New submenus in the Articles section gave EMC greater control over how health and hospital content was presented.

This made it easier for patients to find information relevant to their needs and gave the organization a stronger structure for future content publication.

The benefit extended beyond navigation. Well-organized content can improve search discovery, patient education, and trust in the hospital group.

7. Patients could navigate a more complete healthcare ecosystem

The unified platform brought together hospital information, specialty centers, doctors, telehealth, appointments, promotions, and health content.

This created a more complete experience than either a fragmented website or a single-purpose appointment tool could provide.

Patients could begin with information and continue toward care without repeatedly switching systems.

8. Operational management became simpler

A unified platform reduced the need to manage the same types of information and functions across separate digital environments.

This could lower duplication in content updates, feature maintenance, user support, and release coordination.

The operational benefit was important because consistency depends not only on design, but also on how easily internal teams can manage the system over time.

9. Suitmedia’s work was positively received

Mr. Deden from Grha Kedoya Hospital expressed satisfaction with the project, noting that Suitmedia expanded the reach of promotions and helped disseminate hospital information more effectively.

He also highlighted the team’s fast response and improved communication throughout the project.

This feedback provides qualitative proof that the work improved both the digital outcome and the collaboration required to deliver it. In a complex integration project, communication quality is part of delivery quality.

10. The merger created a stronger foundation for future innovation

With key functions unified, EMC can continue developing the platform around a common structure.

Future improvements can be designed once and made available across the wider healthcare environment, rather than being recreated separately for each hospital.

The second-order effect is greater digital velocity. A unified foundation makes it easier to add services, improve patient journeys, and respond to changes in healthcare expectations.

11. The patient relationship became less dependent on hospital boundaries

Patients may not think in terms of which hospital originally developed a particular app feature. They want access to the right information and care through a reliable experience.

The integrated platform shifted the focus from separate hospital systems to one connected patient relationship with the healthcare group.

This can strengthen trust because patients encounter a more coherent organization at every digital touchpoint.

12. The platform supported a more mature healthcare ecosystem

The project brought together brand integration, content governance, feature alignment, user migration, and technical implementation.

This created a more mature digital operating model for the merged healthcare group. The platform was no longer shaped only by historical hospital boundaries.

Instead, it could evolve around shared patient needs, consistent standards, and coordinated service development.


The deeper lesson: mergers succeed when the patient does not feel the system behind them

1. Integration should be measured by continuity

A technical merger may be complete when systems are connected. A patient-centered merger is complete when users can continue what they need to do without confusion.

The important measure is whether patients can find services, understand the new structure, and complete actions with less effort.

2. Unifying platforms requires preserving useful local information

Centralization should not erase the information that patients value about individual hospitals, doctors, and locations.

The strongest approach creates one shared system while preserving the details needed for local decisions. Unity and specificity are not opposites when the information architecture is clear.

3. Redirects need explanation and a prepared destination

Sending users to a new platform is only the first step. The destination must contain the features, content, and navigation expected by the incoming audience.

A transition is successful when users understand what changed and can continue their journey immediately.

4. Consistency reduces patient cognitive load

When similar functions behave differently across platforms, users must spend energy learning the system instead of focusing on healthcare needs.

Shared patterns across login, telehealth, doctors, specialties, and appointments create familiarity. Familiarity supports confidence and reduces support demand.

5. Content and service actions should remain connected

Articles, promotions, and hospital information are more useful when users can move naturally toward an appointment or another relevant service.

A unified platform should connect communication with action. Otherwise, the organization may gain attention without improving access.

6. Platform consolidation can accelerate future improvement

Maintaining multiple legacy platforms often slows innovation because every change must be designed, tested, and managed several times.

A unified platform creates greater reuse and consistency. This can improve speed while reducing the long-term cost of digital service development.

7. Change management is part of user experience

Patients who have used the old platform need clear guidance during a transition. Pop-ups, redirects, consistent features, and understandable messaging help protect trust.

Digital transformation is not complete when the technology changes. It is complete when users understand how to continue.

8. Integration projects depend on communication as much as code

Merging platforms involves business decisions, technical dependencies, content choices, and stakeholder expectations.

Fast response and clear collaboration help surface issues early and keep the project moving. The client feedback in this project shows that delivery quality includes both the system and the working relationship.


Strategic Insights for the C-Suite

  1. Measure a digital merger by continuity, not only technical completion. Patients should be able to find information, book care, and use services without needing to understand the systems behind the merger.
  2. Create one shared experience while preserving local relevance. Unified platforms should simplify navigation and governance without erasing hospital-specific doctors, services, locations, and patient information.
  3. Treat migration as a communication journey. Redirects, clear messages, and prepared destination platforms help existing users transition with confidence. Silent technical changes create avoidable confusion.
  4. Standardize high-trust healthcare functions first. Login, telehealth, doctor search, appointment booking, and patient information should behave consistently across the group. Familiarity reduces cognitive load and support demand.
  5. Use consolidation to increase future digital velocity. One platform can reduce duplicated maintenance and make new services easier to introduce. The value of integration grows when it becomes a foundation for continuous improvement.

How We Transform Ideas into Reality